We’ve travelled to quite a few places around the world. In comparing our experience in entering/exiting different countries via air travel, some are more efficient than others. For example, Taiwan has a very fast process, because they deploy more x-ray scanners. Not that they have few travelers – they have many, but you really have to hurry to take out your laptop for scanning because the lines move so fast! Japan and Canada are about average when it comes to speed, but the US is really something else.
Scanning hand-carry luggage
We were flying from Taipei via Tokyo and Detroit back to Toronto. There were no hassles during the Tokyo stopover, just re-scanning the carry-on luggage. The experience in Detroit was quite different. At present there are several steps in processing an air passenger, even if you are just making connecting flights and not staying in the US. First there is immigration, where they check your passport, and reserve the right to take your photo and fingerprints, at the officer’s discretion.
Photo and fingerprint
Then you pick up ALL your luggage to go through customs. It does not matter if you’ve checked your luggage all the way to your final destination, and all you want to do is to catch your next flight, you have to retrieve everything to go through customs. If the long lines cause you to miss your flight, that’s just too bad. After customs you deposit your checked-in luggage at the airline counter, then proceed to hand-carry scanning and body-check.
Metal detector
Most other countries will scan your luggage and make you walk through a metal detector. If need be, they’ll also use a wand for body-check. In the US you have to be subjected to a full-body scan, and they may give you a pat-down by hand if you wear pants with cloth or elastic belts, because the waist-bands are thicker and therefore suspicious. They may also use a cotton swab to wipe your hands to detect chemicals, after which you are free to go, assuming everything turns up negative.
Full-body scan
For all the extra measures, are they more secure and safer? Not necessarily. You need to look up actual statistics to prove the point, but nominal evidence from the news seems to indicate that the US is no more secure against acts of terrorism than other countries with less invasive procedures. For sure it’s more cumbersome and less efficient. Ps 127:1 is true – Unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain. Unless the LORD watches over the city, the guards stand watch in vain. When an administration departs from the Lord, its efforts are futile. If you want homeland security, return to the Bible, otherwise everything is in vain.