Q. In Jesus’ second miracle (Jn 4:54) He healed a nobleman’s son. The word “believe” appears three times in the passage (Jn 4:46-54):
• v 48 Then said Jesus unto him, Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe.
• v 50 Jesus saith unto him, Go thy way; thy son liveth. And the man believed the word that Jesus had spoken unto him, and he went his way.
• v 53 So the father knew that [it was] at the same hour, in the which Jesus said unto him, Thy son liveth: and himself believed, and his whole house.
Based on v 48, does v 53 mean the nobleman believed only when he saw the sign that his son was healed at the time Jesus spoke in v 50? Did he have a progression in his faith?
A. No, not quite. There are two Greek verbs translated “believe” in English:
• pisteuo, meaning to place confidence in, to trust, and signifies reliance upon, not mere credence;
• peitho, meaning to persuade.
However, all three “believe(d)” in this passage are just different tenses of pisteuo, so no inference can be made just from the word “believe” alone.
The problem is in another word, “you”, in this passage. Here the KJV did not convey the meaning of the Greek fully, and translates v 48 as Jesus said unto him. The Greek for you is actually plural, twice in this verse. This is corrected in newer translations e.g.
• NKJV Then Jesus said to him, “Unless you people see signs and wonders, you will by no means believe.”
• NIV “Unless you people see signs and wonders,” Jesus told him, “you will never believe.”
• NASB So Jesus said to him, “Unless you people see signs and wonders, you simply will not believe.”
In v 48 Jesus was in fact addressing the crowd, not the royal official.
My opinion is that the official had a certain degree of faith in Jesus to begin with, otherwise he would not have gone and begged Him to come and heal his son. The faith was not as strong as the centurion who asked Jesus to heal his servant (Mt 8:10, Lk 7:9), and who believed could heal by just saying the word without being there. Nevertheless, he took Jesus at His word and departed (v 50). A person with less faith would probably have insisted that Jesus go to his son instead. When he realized that his son was healed at the exact time that Jesus spoke, he and his whole household believed. I interpret this as he deepened in his conviction and trusted or relied on Jesus even more. However, the entire incident is focused on temporal faith for healing. Nothing is said about saving faith in the sense of placing his trust in Jesus alone for his eternal salvation. So I cannot conclude definitively that he believed and was saved.
To many people, seeing is believing e.g.
• Jn 2:23 Now while he was in Jerusalem at the Passover Festival, many people saw the signs he was performing and believed in his name.
• Acts 8:13 Simon (the sorcerer) himself believed and was baptized. And he followed Philip everywhere, astonished by the great signs and miracles he saw.
But keep reading and you’ll find out about their so-called belief:
• Jn 2:24 But Jesus would not entrust himself to them, for he knew all people.
• Acts 8:21-23 You have no part or share in this ministry, because your heart is not right before God. Repent of this wickedness and pray to the Lord in the hope that he may forgive you for having such a thought in your heart. For I see that you are full of bitterness and captive to sin.”
You can see and believe e.g. Thomas:
• Jn 20:29 Then Jesus told him, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”
But to believe having not seen requires more or a higher faith as then the trust is in the person, not the signs and miracles as evidence. The biblical definition of faith is actually Heb 11:1 Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see. I believe the official had this level of faith in Jesus as he took Him at His word. Beyond that I cannot tell as the Scripture is silent.